The upcoming U.S. presidential election is generating significant interest across multiple financial markets, from traditional asset classes like stocks and bonds to commodities and the rapidly growing cryptocurrency market. Betting markets, such as Polymarket, offer insights into the potential outcomes, currently favoring Donald Trump with a 62% chance of winning over Kamala Harris at 38%. With both candidates presenting starkly different economic and regulatory visions, this election could shape the market landscape, especially in cryptocurrencies, in which Trump and Harris hold opposing views.
1. Stock market expectations
The stock market is highly sensitive to regulatory, fiscal, and tax policy changes. Each candidate’s approach could have broad impacts across sectors:
Kamala Harris: Harris represents the Democratic stance of increased regulation, especially in finance and technology, sectors often scrutinized under Democratic leadership. She has advocated for more stringent regulations, likely impacting tech stocks if enacted, as well as stricter environmental policies that would directly affect energy companies reliant on fossil fuels. A Democratic victory, therefore, may shift capital into greener sectors, such as renewable energy, while larger, established technology companies could face pressures from antitrust legislation and privacy concerns.
Donald Trump: Trump’s approach would favor a lower-regulation environment, especially in the technology and energy sectors. He has repeatedly promoted reduced corporate taxes and lighter regulations on traditional energy, policies he claims will stimulate economic growth and attract investors to U.S. equities. A Trump administration could therefore benefit tech giants and legacy energy companies. However, his policies on deregulation could bring potential environmental and ethical concerns to the forefront, potentially causing volatility in green tech stocks as they lose regulatory support.
Historically, the stock market has responded well to pro-business, deregulation-oriented policies, which Trump embodies. However, the broader shift in capital flows toward sustainable investments could see fluctuations based on who controls the White House.
2. Bond market reactions
The bond market, closely linked to inflation expectations and government debt policy, could react differently depending on the winner:
Harris’s Fiscal Policy: Harris’s policies lean towards higher public spending, possibly resulting in increased government borrowing. This could drive up inflation expectations and lead to higher interest rates, which would, in turn, lower bond prices. Harris’s policies might require the Federal Reserve to consider tighter monetary policies if inflationary pressures increase. In the short term, this could decrease demand for government bonds, although demand for corporate bonds in sustainable sectors may rise.
Trump’s Fiscal Approach: Trump’s focus on deregulation and lower taxes might lead to restrained government spending, which would likely stabilize inflation expectations and could help maintain lower yields. For bond investors, this scenario presents a potentially more favorable environment, particularly if fiscal responsibility mitigates inflation risk. Nevertheless, any economic boom from deregulation could also bring inflationary pressures, although Trump has pledged a balanced approach to prevent excessive inflation growth.
As bond prices are inversely related to interest rates, higher anticipated inflation under Harris could reduce bond prices, while a more fiscally conservative approach under Trump might support bond stability.
3. Commodity market insights
The commodity market, especially in energy and metals, could witness substantial impacts based on each candidate's energy policies:
Oil and Gas under Trump: Trump’s pro-energy stance includes expanded support for oil, gas, and coal production. By reducing regulatory costs and boosting domestic energy production, a Trump victory could stabilize or even lower energy prices if supply increases significantly. Additionally, by positioning the U.S. as an energy-independent producer, Trump’s policies might lower the risk premium on oil, potentially decreasing prices globally.
Renewables and Metals under Harris: Harris’s focus on renewable energy could shift demand toward metals essential for green technologies, such as lithium, copper, and cobalt. Stricter regulations on fossil fuels may increase costs for traditional energy sources, making renewables more competitive. This scenario would benefit commodities linked to battery and solar technologies, aligning with global trends towards sustainable investments. Additionally, decreased fossil fuel dependence may increase the volatility of oil prices if supply tightens due to restrictive policies on oil and gas.
4. Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond
The cryptocurrency market is one of the sectors most likely to be influenced by the election outcome, with Trump and Harris holding notably different positions:
Trump’s Pro-Crypto Stance: Trump has adopted a pro-Bitcoin stance, pledging to reduce regulatory barriers and promote cryptocurrency innovation in the U.S. His policies include dismissing SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who has historically taken a strict stance on crypto regulation. Trump’s administration could deregulate the crypto industry, benefiting both retail and institutional investors by reducing compliance costs and increasing market participation. Trump’s position on Bitcoin mining is also relevant; he views it as a decentralized alternative to CBDCs, aligning with libertarian values within the crypto community.
Harris’s Balanced Approach: Although initially associated with Biden’s anti-crypto administration, Harris’s campaign has adopted a more balanced approach, recognizing the crypto sector’s growth potential while emphasizing consumer protection. She has reached out to major crypto firms like Coinbase and Ripple, signaling a willingness to develop policies that support innovation while ensuring safeguards against fraud and excessive speculation. Harris’s regulatory stance, if properly balanced, may provide a more predictable environment for crypto investors but could dampen speculative growth relative to Trump’s approach.
According to André Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Asset Management, Bitcoin could experience a price increase of up to 10.7% if Trump wins, while a Harris victory might lead to a 10.5% decrease due to her regulatory stance.
5. Betting market insights: Polymarket’s perspective
Betting markets offer insights into the public’s expectations, which can reflect anticipated market reactions. On Polymarket, a prominent prediction market, Trump holds a significant lead with a 62% chance of victory, while Harris trails at 38%. This lead in betting markets is mirrored by trends favoring Trump among crypto proponents, given his vocal support for the industry.
However, the betting markets reflect more than just policy preferences—they also capture perceived electability and campaign dynamics. Trump’s advantage in the betting odds may translate into expectations of market support, especially in high-volatility sectors like cryptocurrencies. Polymarket bettors are also positioning for a Republican sweep in the Senate, which could reinforce Trump’s deregulation agenda across multiple asset classes.
Conclusion: Navigating market uncertainty
The 2024 U.S. presidential election presents distinct opportunities and risks across asset classes. Sectors like traditional energy, technology, and finance could experience immediate impacts based on regulatory shifts, while green energy and cryptocurrency markets may witness more gradual shifts aligned with either candidate’s policies.
For stock and bond investors, Trump’s deregulatory stance suggests a potential rally, particularly in sectors historically benefiting from low regulation, like finance and energy. Conversely, Harris’s regulatory focus aligns with sustainable investment, which could benefit green energy and climate-focused portfolios.
Cryptocurrency investors are particularly attuned to Trump’s favorable stance, which could spur rapid adoption and price increases, especially for Bitcoin. Harris’s measured approach, while ensuring consumer protections, might slow speculative growth but foster a safer investment climate for long-term crypto enthusiasts.
With these insights, investors can prepare for volatility and capitalize on potential shifts by staying informed and diversifying portfolios according to the policy trends most likely to shape market trajectories. The election results will play a pivotal role in shaping the regulatory landscape and economic direction of the U.S., with far-reaching implications across global markets.
The material contained in the Kvarn Pulse is produced solely for the purpose of marketing communication. Any information conveyed through Kvarn Pulse should not be construed as an offer or an invitation to make any purchase or sale decisions, or as an encouragement to make investment decisions about any investment object. Copying or borrowing the content of the newsletter without Kvarn's express permission is prohibited. The information presented in the newsletter pertains to the situation prevailing at the time of writing, and the information may or may not have changed. Kvarn Capital Oy does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the newsletter or referred to in the newsletter.
